(1) ECOR GM Shri Surendra Singh Khurana in his Independence Day address (available at http://eastcoastrailway.gov.in/custom/press_release/index.php) while talking about ECOR, said:
“With only 4% of the track of Indian Railways, we cater for about 12% of total loading of Indian railway and about 7% of total earning of IR.”
(2) From http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/irfca/messages
For the 2003-2004 and 2004-05 the working expense as part of gross earnings of the ECOR zone is the second best at 66.64% and 61.75% respectively.
- The profit making zones in those years were
- South east central (62.8% and 56.1%),
- ECOR (66.64% and 61.75%),
- North central (76.33% and 66.71%),
- Central (80.29% and 82.48%),
- South eastern (81.24% and 83.51%),
- South Central (85.72% and 83.62%),
- West Central (80.99% and 84.08%),
- South Western (91.35% and 86.15%),
- Western (93.21% and 90.85%),
- Northern (91.08% and 92.89%) and
- East Central (93.65% and 98.9%).
- The loss making zones were:
- metro Kolkata (247% and 264.38%),
- North Eastern (151.93% and 160.88%),
- Northeast Frontier (147.98% and 159.45%),
- Eastern (161.3% and 152.84%),
- Southern (118.55% and 120.79%) and
- North Western ( 106.26% and 104.98%).
(3) Based on (1) and (2) above ECOR probably makes about 10% of Indian Railways profit.
(4) The above raises the following questions:
Why does not ECOR have the track length commensurate with the earnings it makes?
Why are no serious efforts being made to correct this; especially with many planned lines being given only minimal annual budgets which in many cases are less than the annual inflation.
(5) (Using the data in
In terms of rail density: the average rail density (2004-05) for India is 19.13; the rail density is highest in Delhi (138.2) followed by West Bengal (43.4), Punjab (41.6), Haryana (36.1), Bihar (35.9), Uttar Pradesh (35.8), etc. while Chhatisgarh (8.6) and Orissa (14.6) are among the states with low rail densities.
(6) The data from (1-3) and (5) show that while Indian Railways is making a lot of revenue and profit from ECOR (big part of which is in Orissa) and also SER (part of which is in Orissa), both ECOR and Orissa have been grossly neglected. This is true about the past; what about the future?
Mr V. N. Mathur, Member (Traffic) of the Railway Board is reported to have said:
“We’ve submitted to the Planning Commission a Rs 251,000-crore proposal for implementation by the end of the Eleventh Plan. We’ve indicated mobilisation of Rs 90,000 crore from within and 29 per cent of the projected estimate by way of market borrowing. For the balance, we may have to approach the government for support. But then nothing has yet been finalised.”
(8) Many expensive and highflying plans by Indian Railways for the 11th plan, but most bypass Orissa and ECOR.
(8A) Freight Corridor: Various news reports suggest that the 11th plan (next 5-7 years) will take up the western and eastern corridors.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/9030.html
Western Corridor: 1,483-km Delhi-Mumbai route
Eastern Corridor: 1,280-km Delhi-Kolkata route
http://www.hindu.com/2006/09/17/stories/2006091708640400.htm reports that the “Chennai-Kolkata and Chennai-Mumbai corridors will be included in the second phase of the Dedicated Freight Corridor Project.”
(8B) High Speed Corridors:
“Delhi-Chandigarh-Amritsar, Mumbai-Baroda-Ahmedabad, Chennai-Bangalore-Coimbatore and Howrah-Asansol-Patna — were announced in the current rail budget.”
(8C) Metro Rails and rapid transit systems: From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_in_India#Metro and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangalore_Metro
The following are the existing or under construction/expansion metro rail projects.
- Delhi Metro
- Hyderabad Metro
- Kolkata Metro
- Kolkata Suburban Railway
- Lucknow MEMU
- Chennai Metro
- Mumbai Suburban Railway
- Bangalore Metro
- Mumbai Metro •
- Thane Metro
- In planning:
- Ahmedabad Metro
- Kochi Metro
- Goa
- Pune
(9) In essence revenue and profit generated in ECOR is being ploughed into other parts of India, which by itself is not wrong as Orissa is a part of India, but lets analyze who are the losers: the adivasi and backward areas of Orissa (and hence of India) who are backward partly because lack of proper connectivity, and this neglect continues to keep them backward and prevents them from catching up.
Am I making this up?
No, here are the data and following it is what planning commission teams have themselves said.
(10) The tribal population percentage of the KBK districts are as follows:
Malkangiri 58.36% (+19.96% SC), Rayagada 56.04% (+14.28% SC), Nabarangpur 55.27% (+15.09% SC), Koraput 50.67% (+13.41% SC), Nuapada 35.95% (+13.09% SC), Kalahandi 28.88% (+17.01% SC), Sonepur 22.11% (+9.5% SC), Balangir 22.06% (+15.39% SC). Two adjacent districts also have high tribal population. They are Kandhamala 51.51% (+18.21% SC) and Gajapati 47.88% (+8.77% SC). Tirbal percentage of Mayurbhanj is 57.87% and Sundergarh is 50.74%.
(11) The literacy rates in the KBK districts are abysmally low. Malkangiri 31.26%, Nabarangpur 34.26%, Rayagada 35.61%, Koraput 36.2%, Nuapada 42.29%, Kalahandi 46.2%, Balangir 54.93%, Sonepur 64.07%. Two adjacent districts also have low literacy: Gajapati 41.73% and Kandhamala 52.95%. The state average is 63.1%.
(12) Population below the poverty line in southern Orissa (of which KBK is a part) is reported to be 89.17% of the people according to the 1999-2000 NSS data and 72% of the families according to the 1997 census.
(13) From http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article174.html
Table 1 provides State level data on poverty ratios during 2004-05. The lowest poverty ratio was 5.4 per cent for Jammu and Kashmir and highest poverty ratio was for Orissa (46.4 per cent). States with poverty ratio of less than 15 per cent were Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Andhra Pradesh. As against them, States with poverty ratio above 30 per cent were Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Orissa.
|
Table 1: Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line (2004-05) based on URP Consumption
|
|
State
|
% of Persons
|
No. of persons (in lakhs)
|
% of Persons
|
No. of Persons (in lakhs)
|
% of persons
|
No. of persons(in lakhs)
|
|
S.No.
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
(6)
|
|
1 Jammu & Kashmir
|
4.6
|
3.7
|
7.9
|
2.2
|
5.4
|
5.9
|
|
2 Punjab
|
9.1
|
15.1
|
7.1
|
6.5
|
8.4
|
21.6
|
|
3 Himachal Pradesh
|
10.7
|
6.1
|
3.4
|
0.2
|
10.0
|
6.4
|
|
4 Goa
|
5.4
|
0.4
|
21.3
|
1.6
|
13.8
|
2.0
|
|
5 Haryana
|
13.6
|
21.5
|
15.1
|
10.6
|
14.0
|
32.1
|
|
6 Delhi
|
6.9
|
0.6
|
15.2
|
22.3
|
14.7
|
22.9
|
|
7 Kerala
|
13.2
|
32.4
|
20.2
|
17.2
|
15.0
|
49.6
|
|
8 Andhra Pradesh
|
11.2
|
64.7
|
28.0
|
61.4
|
15.8
|
126.1
|
|
9 Gujarat
|
19.1
|
63.5
|
13.0
|
27.2
|
16.8
|
90.7
|
|
10 Assam
|
22.3
|
54.5
|
3.3
|
1.3
|
19.7
|
55.8
|
|
11 Rajasthan
|
18.7
|
87.4
|
32.9
|
47.5
|
22.1
|
134.9
|
|
12 Tamil Nadu
|
22.8
|
76.5
|
22.2
|
69.1
|
22.5
|
|