{"id":3902,"date":"2010-08-17T16:44:12","date_gmt":"2010-08-17T20:44:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/?p=3902"},"modified":"2010-08-17T16:44:12","modified_gmt":"2010-08-17T20:44:12","slug":"odisha-government-responds-to-the-saxena-committee-report-on-vedantas-operations-in-kalahandi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/archives\/3902","title":{"rendered":"Odisha government responds to the Saxena Committee report on Vedanta&#8217;s operations in Kalahandi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t have the letter that the Odisha government wrote. But the following excerpts from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tathya.in\/news\/story.asp?sno=4436\" target=\"_self\">a report in tathya.in<\/a> gives some idea.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;\" class=\"Apple-style-span\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px;\" class=\"Apple-style-span\">&#8230; However responding to the report, in a letter to the Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MOEF), the State Government has said that &ldquo;it is shocking to note that the Saxena Committee has preferred to discuss in a derogatory manner the issues, which have been considered and adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India.&rdquo;<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Upendra Nath Behera, Principal Secretary of the Department of Forest &amp; Environment (DOEF) in his letter to the Secretary, MOEF has said that a preliminary study of the report shows that it has raised serious allegations against the State Government.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>It has cast aspersions on the intention of the State Government about implementing the Forest Rights Act (FRA), when the Government of Odisha is credited to be the second best performing state in the country in implementation of FRA.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The report has asked the MOEF to reject the application of the State Government for diversion of forest land for the above purpose as mining in Niyamgiri will destroy wildlife habitat and it will cause hydrological disaster.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>It has also said that mining will destroy the cultural, religious and economic habitat of the Dongaria Kondhs, who reside in the forest area proposed for diversion.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#ff0000\">The State Government has pointed out that the issues raised by the Saxena Committee were the subject matter of different PILs filed by various activists before the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which ultimately came up before the Supreme Court.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n<p>In view of the technical issues raised in the applications, the Apex Court had directed MOEF to appoint expert bodies for examining various issues.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun had conducted studies on the impact of the mining project on biodiversity and wildlife including its habitat.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Central Mine Planning &amp; Design Institute (CMPDI), Ranchi conducted studies on the impact of the mining project on soil erosion, impact of ground vibration on hydrological regime including ground porosity and permeability.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>All these issues were discussed in the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) on 30 August, 2006, when the project was placed before the Committee for scrutiny.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Similarly the project was challenged in the Supreme Court on the grounds of violation of FRA.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>After elaborate discussion of the reports of the expert bodies, views of the State Government and MOEF covering all issues relating to ecology, wildlife, hydrology, soil erosion, tribal life and implementation of different environmental laws, the Supreme Court on 23 November, 2007 cleared the project with certain directions.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>On compliance of all the directions of the Apex court, the project was cleared by the Supreme Court on 8 August, 2008.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The State Government has said that &ldquo;it is of course, understood that the MOEF has not taken a view on the recommendation of the Committee.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>The Government of Odisha in its&rsquo; letter has said that &ldquo;it believe that if a judicious view is taken by the MOEF, most of the findings of the Saxena Committee will not hold water.&quot;<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Under this backdrop, the State Government has urged the MOEF to provide an opportunity to present its&rsquo; views before taking a final decision in this matter.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t have the letter that the Odisha government wrote. But the following excerpts from a report in tathya.in gives some idea. &#8230; However responding to the report, in a letter to the Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MOEF), the State Government has said that &ldquo;it is shocking to note that the Saxena Committee has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[285,214,399,733,468,735,441,161],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anil-agarwal","category-bauxite","category-environment","category-forestization","category-key-center-state-issues","category-mine-related-pollution","category-supreme-court","category-vedanta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orissalinks.com\/orissagrowth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}